Article

The newest version of bpm’online 7.13 introduces over 200 innovations that accelerate business transformation and growth, as well as over 50 marketplace apps to extend the functionality of bpm’online products.

Register today!

Share

0 comments
Log in or register to comment
Article

Bpm'online is proud to announce that it has been recognized as a Leader in the Midmarket CRM Suite and Sales Force Automation categories, as well as named the One to Watch in the Enterprise CRM Suite in the CRM Market Awards 2018 by CRM Magazine, one of the most highly regarded media in the CRM industry.

Read the full press release>>

Share

0 comments
Log in or register to comment
Article

We believe that this recognition is driven by significant development of our sales offering empowered with intelligent tools and technologies designed to accelerate sales operations and drive revenue growth.

Share the joy of this moment with us - get your complimentary copy of the report today!

Download the report >> 

Share

0 comments
Log in or register to comment
Article

Case

An arbitrary object, say, an account, has parameter 1, parameter 2 and parameter 3. The object has a detail displaying records of this object type, e.g., accounts that meet the condition "parameter 1 + parameter 2 match the primary record", "parameter 2 + parameter 3 match the primary record", "parameter 1 + parameter 3 match the primary record". The detail enables filtering by several columns. How can I enable UNION, i.e., "summarize" several independent sets of such filters?

Solution

Let's assume we have the following population of the account table:

As per the above description, the page and detail will be populated as follows:

1) The first variant of detial population:

2) The secon variant of detail population. Maybe combining values was meant, in this case the detail and page will be as follows:

"The detail enables filtering by several columns. How can I enable UNION, i.e., "summarize" several independent sets of such filters?"

If the first variant of detail population was meant, then filterGroup in the filtering method on the page will look as follows:

If the second variant of detail population was meant, then filterGroup in the filtering method on the page will look as follows:

Note the mistake in adding groups - the keys are not specified. The correct adding of groups is displayed below:

filterGroup.add(1”, filterGroup1);
filterGroup.add(2”, filterGroup2);
filterGroup.add(3”, filterGroup3);

 

Share

0 comments
Log in or register to comment
Question

Hi Community,

 

I am commiting changes on my package to SVN repository and I got this error "ROOT CAUSE INCONSISTENT LINE ENDING STYLE" (please see image below), how can I fix this error? Thanks

 

 

Like

0 comments
Log in or register to comment